-
School budgets have been cut by £1.7 billion per pupil
in real terms since 2015, Labour analysis of IFS data
shows
-
Party releases new figures showing the scale of school
funding cuts as Shadow Education Secretary visits a school in
Yorkshire and criticises Chancellor’s ‘little extras’ comment
as “downright insulting”
Annual school budgets have been cut by £1.7 billion in real terms
since 2015, a Labour analysis of IFS figures reveals.
The analysis shows that annual spending on schools would be
£1.7bn higher in 2019-20 than the amount allocated by government
if funding per pupil had been maintained in real terms since the
Tories won a majority in 2015.
The new analysis of cuts to annual funding for schools comes
after the Chancellor’s controversial announcement of a one-off
fund for schools to spend on so-called “little extras” in this
week’s Budget speech. The funding was for capital funding only,
and worth just over a tenth of the amount already cut from
capital funding overall. Schools will not be able to spend it on
running costs like staff pay, and the Chancellor suggested that
the average school could use it for items like a “couple of
whiteboards”.
Commenting, MP, Labour’s Shadow
Secretary of State for Education, said:
“The Tories have slashed billions from schools and now the
Chancellor thinks they should be grateful he’s offered them a
whiteboard. His suggestion that schools just need ‘little extras’
is downright insulting.
“Instead of offering a sticking plaster to schools this
government should be genuinely investing in them, reversing their
unjustifiable cuts.
“The next Labour government will reverse these cuts, giving our
schools the resources they need and increasing per pupil funding
to a record high.”
ENDS
Notes to Editors
A Labour analysis of figures from the Institute for Fiscal
Studies found that school budgets are down £1.7 billion in real
terms compared to 2015.
Sources: Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2018 annual
report on education spending in England, 17th September
2018,https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/13306
For per pupil spending see Figure 3.2 in the accompanying
tables.
For pupil numbers see Figure 1.2 in the accompanying
tables.
(Real terms funding cut calculated as change in per pupil funding
* pupil numbers in primary and secondary).
In his Budget speech, the Chancellor of the Exchequer gave
schools £400 million to fund “little extras”:
“So today I am announced £400m in-year bonus to help our schools
buy the little extras they need.”
HM Treasury, Budget 2018: ’s speech
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/budget-2018-philip-hammonds-speech
The Chancellor’s announcement, and the use of “little extras” to
describe the funding needs of schools, drew significant
criticism.
BBC News, Anger over Chancellor’s £400m ‘little extras’
for schools
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-46028757
Evening Standard, faces backlash for saying
schools need ‘little extras’ after huge funding cuts
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/budget-2018-philip-hammond-facing-furious-backlash-for-saying-schools-need-little-extras-after-huge-a3974911.html
A school in the Prime Minister’s own constituency has previously
written to parents asking for donations to buy basic resources
like textbooks, pens, and even toilet roll.
The Sun, School Rip-Off: Parents ‘in tears’ as
cash-strapped primary school begs families to donate toilet
roll
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/uknews/6535747/st-edmund-campion-catholic-primary-school-begs-families-donate-toilet-roll-teaching-material/
The Prime Minister has repeatedly stated that the government has
increased school funding at Prime Minister’s Questions:
On Wednesday 24th October she said “What have we
seen under this Government? We have seen more money being made
available to the police… and more money going into our
schools”.
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-10-24/debates/33C297D5-BF19-4837-B54B-213D5E089243/Engagements
Figures from the National Audit Office show that schools have
faced a total cut in their spending power of £2.7 billion since
2015. These cuts fell between 2015-16 and 2017-18, and represent
a cumulative fall in spending. In additionthey do
notaccount for additional funding that has previously been
announced by the government,or the increase in pupil numbers in
the years since additional funding was promised.
See National Audit Office, Financial sustainability of
schools, 14th December 2016
https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Financial-sustainability-of-schools.pdf
Conservative response to Labour on school
funding
Responding, MP, Minister of State for School
Standards, said:
“This year we have given every local authority more money for
every pupil in every school. School spending is rising in
real terms because of our balanced approach to the economy,
which is seeing us spend more on public services while keeping
debt falling and taxes cut.
“Thanks to the hard work of teachers and pupils, 1.9 million more
children are attending good or outstanding schools compared with
2010.
“Labour cannot deliver the strong economy to give schools the
funding that they need. What’s more, their plan to scrap
academies and free schools would reverse the reforms that are
raising standards in schools, putting ideology before education”.
Notes to Editors
- · We are
investing in the future of our children by spending a record
amount on schools so that they receive a world-class
education. We are protecting the schools budget in
real terms, so that by 2020 we will be spending 50 per cent more
per pupil than in 2000. Over the next two years alone, the
schools budget will rise from nearly £41 billion a year to more
than £43 billion a year, and the Government is investing £5.8
billion to 2020 to create even more good school places
(Hansard, 6 November 2017, Volume
630, link; Hansard,
30 June 2017, WA, link; IFS,
21 September 2017, link; IFS,
April 2016, link; DfE, 18
October 2017, link).
- · Our new
funding formula provides a cash increase in respect of every
school, with historically underfunded schools receiving the
largest increases. Following consultation, local
authorities will continue to make the final decisions on the
local distribution of funding until 2020, but under the formula
every school will attract at least 0.5 per cent more per pupil in
2018-19, and 1 per cent more in 2019-20. Historically underfunded
schools will attract significantly larger increases
(DfE, 14 September 2017,link).
- · We are
driving up school standards, so that more young people develop
the skills and knowledge they need to succeed.There are
now 1.9 million more children attending good and outstanding
schools, compared with 2010. 86 per cent of children in England
are attending good and outstanding schools, up from 66 per cent
in 2010 (DfE, August 2018, link; Ofsted
Data View, accessed 4 December 2017, link).
The IFS have said that our improvements to funding
are helping pupils from poorer backgrounds.
- · We have
eliminated the differences in education funding to children from
all social backgrounds so that every child has the opportunity to
get on in life. The IFS found that changes to the
distribution of school funding, increased staying-on rates and
reforms to university funding mean that there was no difference
in the amount of public money spent in total on educating the
poorest and richest pupils who were taking their GCSEs in 2010
(IFS, Briefing note, 31 October
2018, link).
- · We have
made the funding system more beneficial so that the poorest
children have the most to gain. The IFS has found
that lower-income students receive more education funding than
the better off because of our school funding reforms and getting
more children to participate in education after the age of 16
(IFS, Briefing note, 31 October
2018, link).
Using Labour’s own calculations, we are putting more
money into schools in real terms between 2015 and
2020.
- · Using
Labour's own calculations, we are putting more money into
schools in real terms from 2015 to 2020. Using
the IFS study Labour refer to, we will be investing £800
million more into school in 2020 than 2015 in real terms
(IFS, 2018 annual report on education spending in
England, 17 September 2018, link).
- · We have
raised spending on education in real terms since
2010. The overall Department for
Education budget is up from £59.5 billion in 2010 to a
projected £68.5 billion in 2020 in real terms (HMT, Public
Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2014, 17 July 2014,
p.27 link; HMT, Public
Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2018, 19 July
2018, p.28, link) .
Labour would reverse the vital reforms that are
raising standards in schools.
-
· wants to scrap academies
and free schools putting Labour’s ideology before what works
for our children.She said: ‘We’ll start by immediately
ending the Tories’ academy and free schools programmes. They
neither improve standards nor empower staff or parents’. Free
schools and academies are changing lives but Labour (Angela
Rayner, Speech to Conference
2018, link).
- · Labour
can’t be trusted with our children as they u-turned on academies
and free schools. Just last year, said: ‘Most parents,
including me, are interested in a good school that their kids
can go to. They don’t care what it’s called, quite frankly.’
(Schools Week, 23 September 2017, link).
- · Labour
don’t trust teachers to do their job and would increase their
workload, meaning less time spent teaching our
children. is committed to imposing a
‘common rulebook’ on all teachers (Angela
Rayner, Speech to Conference
2018, link).
- · Labour
want politicians and bureaucrats to run our schools, taking power
away from our teachers. said: ‘We will use our
time in government to bring all publicly funded schools back
into the mainstream public sector, with a common rulebook and
under local democratic control.’ Labour would take us back to
days where a failing school would stay open with the
politicians running it into the ground (Angela
Rayner, Speech to Conference
2018, link).