Without sufficient funding SEN code of practice is nothing more than an empty promise, say school leaders
School leaders’ union NAHT today (Wednesday 5 September) publish a
report into the crisis in supporting children with special
educational needs in schools. Paul Whiteman, NAHT general
secretary, said: “The picture facing schools supporting children
with special educational needs is bleak. Not only are school
budgets at breaking point, there have been severe cuts to health
and social care provision. Schools are left struggling to meet the
needs of our most...Request free trial
School leaders’ union NAHT today (Wednesday 5 September) publish
a report into the crisis in supporting children with special
educational needs in schools.
Paul Whiteman, NAHT general secretary, said: “The picture facing
schools supporting children with special educational needs is
bleak. Not only are school budgets at breaking point, there have
been severe cuts to health and social care provision. Schools are
left struggling to meet the needs of our most vulnerable pupils.
Without sufficient funding and a more coherent approach, the SEN
code of practice is nothing more than an empty promise from
government to parents and children.”
NAHT received 637 responses to a survey of its members in
May-June. The key findings were that:
94% of respondents are finding it harder to resource the support
required to meet the needs of pupils with SEND than they did two
years ago.73% of respondents said it was harder to resource
support for pupils with SEND due to cuts to mainstream funding,
as cuts to teaching assistants and pastoral staff have had a
major impact on schools supporting their most vulnerable
pupils.70% of respondents said that cuts to health and social
care budgets were making it harder to support the needs of
children with SEND in the last two years.Only 2% of respondents
said that the top up funding they received was sufficient to meet
individual Education Health and Care Plans (EHCPs) or statements
for pupils with SEND.83% of respondents reported not receiving
ANY funding from health and social care budgets to support pupils
with statements or EHCPs.30% of respondents don’t receive
services from health and social care to support their
pupils.There are long delays for pupils to be assessed – with 15%
waiting over 6 months from referral for an EHCP assessment, and
39% waiting over 6 months from referral for an EHCP to be
produced.
Paul Whiteman continued: “One million of the recognised 1.28
million children with SEN do not have any additional funding
afforded to them. That means that the financial burden of
additional support penalises those mainstream schools that are
the most inclusive. This is unsustainable. Schools are seriously
struggling to fund SEN support in the face of crippling budget
pressures that sees them forced to cut critical support staff. We
urgently need the government to recognise the scale of the
problem and to secure an immediate increase in funding from the
Treasury. It is make or break time for school funding.
“However, the education budget was never intended to meet all the
needs of pupils with SEND. Currently the ‘health and care’ are
missing from children’s Education, Health and Care Plans, with
little funding or support from health and social care services.
Education cannot do it alone. Schools need the support of
specialist services to meet vulnerable children’s needs. The
government must provide more funding for health and social care
services.”
The impact on children
Behind the numbers in this report lie the experiences of
our members, and more importantly the children they are working
to support, and it is those which most clearly reveal a system in
crisis:
“A child arrived in September in a wheelchair with
Cerebral palsy – we have to provide 1:1 support and 2:1 for
toileting – we have received not a penny. Applied for top up
funding – still waiting eight months later”
“It is extremely difficult to get children's needs
diagnosed in the first instance and almost impossible to access
CAMHS service”
“An Educational psychologist will only be provided
for an EHCP application. We need their support before it gets to
this stage. You can only get a child onto the CAHMS list if they
are suicidal or worse”
“We have had no local authority Educational
Psychologist for 2 years and have had to buy private EP reports
at £520 a time. Speech and Language no longer work with the
children in school, but make a termly visit and give
recommendations, which we have to fund support for. Mental health
services are so hard to access that we are now paying for our own
counsellor, which takes up a very substantial portion of our
funding”
“It is pointless having EHCPs if there is no funding
to support what they say the pupil needs”
“Top up funding is being used to run our schools as
the £10,000 per place has not been reviewed in almost a decade
and is not currently enough to cover running costs of special
schools”
“We are commissioning services from Health which were
previously free but as the criteria for involvement is raised we
have to pay for support (Speech Therapy, Physiotherapy and so
on)”
“The CAMHS [Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Services] threshold is so high that pupils need to have attempted
suicide to be taken on by CAMHS in this area”
“Changes to health provision for under-fives means
fewer are identified before starting nursery. I have parents who
are shocked that we have concerns when their child starts
nursery”
“We have 39 children at SEN Support and there is no
funding to support them due to the other pressures on
SEND”
“There are long waiting times for educational
psychologists and the work they are prepared to do is dictated by
them rather than the child/school’s needs. Speech and Language
therapists we just can’t afford to buy enough time so have to
wait far too long. We use Occupational Therapists, not physios:
their training is not sound enough in most cases to meet our
needs. The thresholds are so ridiculous for CAMHS that we can
hardly access them despite very high levels of significant needs.
Individual CAMHS workers are highly effective but far too few and
their system makes them inaccessible most of the
time.”
The above are selected comments provided alongside
answers in our survey which leave no doubt as to the urgency of
the action needed to support children with SEND.
|