Asked by Lord Dykes To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether
they expect to reach a full agreement with European Union
negotiators on the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European
Union before the European Council meeting in October. The Minister
of State, Department for Exiting the European Union (Lord Callanan)
(Con) My Lords, we have made...Request free trial
Asked by
-
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they expect to
reach a full agreement with European Union negotiators on
the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union
before the European Council meeting in October.
-
The Minister of State, Department for Exiting the European
Union (Lord Callanan) (Con)
My Lords, we have made significant progress on a withdrawal
agreement, reaching agreement on more than three-quarters
of the legal text and locking down the full chapters on
citizens’ rights, the implementation period and the
financial settlement. We are continuing to work hard and at
pace to reach a final agreement by October.
-
(CB)
I think the whole House appreciates that the Minister has
been working hard to reassure Members of this House about
these complicated matters. However, are the Government
aware of the looming catastrophe they face, not least
because the end-June meeting of the European Council is
most unlikely to bail them out of their own mistakes? Is
not, therefore, the moment of truth approaching—when the
single market and the customs union will be the only
practical options?
-
No, we have been very clear that we are leaving the single
market and the customs union, and we remain optimistic,
like the EU, that we should be able to reach an agreement
by October.
-
of Kentish Town
(Lab)
My Lords, this is rather a shambles, is it not? In fact, we
are reading on the Channel 4 website that tempers within
the Government are “fraying”. That is hardly surprising.
The White Paper that said would be the,
“most significant publication on the EU since the
referendum”,
is not appearing. I do not know whether the fact that the
White Paper has not come out is worse for Parliament and
the people here or for our negotiating partners in
Brussels. Either way, we need to know what is going on.
Will the Minister talk to his bit of the usual channels if
I talk to mine and ensure that we have a proper debate on
these negotiations immediately after the June summit?
-
When the noble Baroness said it was a shambles, I assumed
she was referring to the ’s position on the EU,
which, given the statements yesterday and by Keir Hardie on
the radio this morning, is a disgraceful shambles—
-
Noble Lords
Starmer!
-
It would indeed be impressive if Keir Hardie had gone on
the radio this morning. I am sorry, I was of course
referring to .
-
(LD)
Will the Government be advising citizens to stock up on
dried, tinned and frozen food, jerry cans of fuel and their
prescription medicines, given that it was reported at the
weekend that Whitehall is planning for the port of Dover to
collapse on day one of a crash-out no-deal Brexit, leading
to a critical shortage of supplies? Will the Government
share this planning with the public?
-
The claims that the noble Baroness refers to are completely
false. A significant amount of work and decision-making has
gone into our no-deal plans. We hope there will not be a
no-deal situation but, as a responsible Government, we need
to plan accordingly.
-
(Con)
My Lords, setting aside both Cassandra and Keir Hardie,
when is the White Paper due to be published?
-
The White paper will be published when it is ready.
-
(UKIP)
My Lords, when will the Government see that they hold all
the best cards in these negotiations? Why do they not offer
Brussels continuing security, mutual residence and free
trade—all of which are much more in the interests of the
real people of Europe than they are of ours—and then tell
the Eurocrats how much cash we will give their failing
project, which will depend on how they have behaved with
all of the above? Why should that take more than a month?
-
As the noble Lord is aware, we have offered the EU
unconditional security guarantees, as is right and proper,
and we are negotiating in good faith to achieve the
free-trade relationship that he talked about.
-
(PC)
My Lords, a moment ago the Minister made reference to the
Government’s no-deal plan. Will he therefore confirm that
the Government are seriously confronting the likelihood of
leaving without a deal?
-
As I also said, we hope there will be a deal. We are
working towards a deal and negotiating in good faith, as we
believe our European partners are. However, as a
responsible Government, it is important that we plan for
all eventualities.
-
(Con)
My Lords, will my noble friend confirm that if indeed we
are in the unfortunate position of leaving without a deal,
we will not be paying the £40 billion to the EU?
-
If there is no deal then there will be no withdrawal
agreement, and that bill would be included in the
withdrawal agreement so the noble Lord is correct.
-
(Lab)
The Minister said we are negotiating in good faith. I
thought the White Paper was supposed to be our negotiating
plan. If the Government have a plan and we cannot see it,
when are we going to see it? If they cannot see it either,
what are they negotiating about?
-
We are negotiating on the issues that we discussed in the
first round. We have reached agreement on citizens’ rights
and the financial settlement, and we are discussing the
Northern Ireland border. Of course what we want to do is
get on to discussing the free-trade agreement and all the
other settlement issues, which we will do in due course. We
will publish a White Paper setting out our position in
detail when it is ready.
-
(LD)
My Lords, have the Government done enough to ensure that they
carry domestic public opinion, including the right-wing
press, with the deal that they eventually strike? I see
announcements from the Government that we are going to
continue to respect the decisions of the European Court of
Justice in a number of areas, and clearly we are going to
continue to contribute to a large number of European
financial arrangements, according to the proposals that have
been put out in the slide shows that were slipped out over
the last two or three weekends. This is going to arouse a lot
of anger on the Back Benches of the Conservative Party and in
the Mail and the Telegraph. Should the Government not be
preparing domestic public opinion for the necessary
compromises that they are already beginning to propose to
their European counterparts?
-
I am not sure that I would accept the scenario outlined by
the noble Lord. We have always been clear that where there
are areas in which we can co-operate with our European
partners, in some small areas, we will make an appropriate
contribution to the costs, but we have also been clear that
the days of making vast contributions to the European budget
are at an end.
-
(Con)
Where does the noble Lord, , get his forecasts of
doom and gloom from? I hope it is not the Bank of England.
-
I must apologise; I did not quite catch that question.
-
My Lords, where does the noble Lord, , get all his forecasts
of doom and gloom from? I hope it is not the Bank of England.
-
I do not presume to assume where the noble Lord gets his
predictions of doom and gloom from, but they are probably
wrong.
-
(Lab)
My Lords—
-
(Lab)
My Lords—
-
The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence (Earl Howe)
(Con)
My Lords, I must leave it to noble Lords on the Labour
Benches to observe the courtesies of the House.
-
My Lords, the security of Europe is critical for the security
of our nation. Seventy-four years ago today, we and the
Americans invaded Normandy and ensured the safety of Europe.
Do we now have agreements with the EU in the defence and
security arena, because that is crucial for us?
-
The noble Lord is of course correct about our proud history
of contributing to the defence of Europe, and we should
remember the sacrifices that were made on this historic day.
We do not yet have agreement on security matters, but our
offer of security guarantees is unconditional and, I think,
very generous.
|