Religious education should be better harnessed to combat
violent extremism, a new Civitas paper urges. Rather than
focusing on the teaching of ‘British values’, R.E. lessons could
draw on the teachings of different faiths to promote shared
values and mutual tolerance.
David Conway, professorial research fellow at Civitas, suggests
that classes should read and discuss the 18th century
play Nathan the Wise, in which characters from
each of the Abrahamic faiths – Judaism, Christianity and Islam
– come together to transcend their differences.
In the essay, Conway says that such an approach would do more
to foster mutual respect between different faiths than the
recent emphasis on teaching ‘British values’, which may
alienate some.
‘The teaching of religious education could be harnessed to
combat religiously-motivated acts of violent extremism in a
much more inclusive way than by insisting on presenting the
appropriate tolerant and moderate values we would like all our
young people to acquire through their schooling as somehow the
special preserve of Britain and the British,’ he writes.
Conway sets out the potential value of teaching Gotthold
Ephraim Lessing’s Nathan the Wise, particularly
the section which presents the ‘Fable of the Three Rings’,
which recognises the universal values that are espoused and
shared by Muslims, Christians and Jews alike.
At the end of the play, set in Jerusalem around 1191,
characters from each of the Abrahamic religions join together
in an embrace of mutual amity and friendship, all potential
friction arising from their adherence to different faiths
having been transcended.
‘Combatting religiously-motivated violent extremism through
what is taught in schools would stand a much better chance of
success if it could draw on the religions of the young people
whose immunization against radicalisation is being sought,’
Conway writes.
‘Those concerned today about the radicalisation of young
British-born Muslims often speak of the need to develop an
appropriate counter-narrative that will help to immunise them
from the possible appeal of Jihadism and Salafism.
‘Yet however admirable such an aspiration might be, any
prospect of success for the development of such a
counter-narrative is immediately threatened if it is
constrained to be framed, as the British government has lately
demanded it be, as requiring Muslims to recognise the need to
embrace British values.
‘As many have noted, the requisite values in question are
universal, and have long been espoused in moderate and
mainstream versions by all three Abrahamic faiths.’
Conway urges the current Commission on Religious Education to
consider how the subject might be better used to combat
extremism than the approach emphasised in recent years of
teaching British values.
‘Religious education still remains a compulsory school subject
whose resources for combatting religiously motivated violent
extremism have hardly begun to be tapped. There is hardly a
better time than now for considering how it might be made to do
so, given that the subject is currently under review by a
special independent commission.’