-
· Government
must explain why state assistance in absence of competition is an
appropriate use of public money
-
· Motability
Operations’ large reserves are out of proportion to the risks it
faces
- · MPs
brand Motability Operations’ CEO Mike Betts’ £1.7 million salary
“totally unacceptable”
- · NAO
should conduct a full value for money review into Motability
Scheme
In a unanimously-agreed Report on the Motability Scheme published
today, Monday 21 May 2018, the Work & Pensions and Treasury
Committees brand senior pay at Motability Operations
“unacceptable”, and say its large reserves are out of proportion
to the risks it faces. The Motability Scheme operates as a
monopoly in its remit to provide disabled people with access to a
vehicle, in return for some of their Personal Independence
Payment benefit.
The Committees say:
- Motability badly needs a new roadmap for how it manages the
scheme’s finances. It is difficult to square the high levels of
executive pay and significant financial reserves at Motability
Operations with the scheme’s charitable objectives and the wider
context of pressures on welfare expenditure.
- Motability Operations is the only private organisation
entitled to receive welfare payments for the leasing of vehicles.
It receives this privilege from Motability without a competitive
tender. No other car leasing company is – or can be – so heavily
dependent on public funding. Motability Operations also benefits
from two types of tax relief: on Value
Added Tax (VAT), providing a 20 per cent discount on the value of
the car, and Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), providing a 12 per cent
discount on the insurance element of leasing the vehicle. In
practice, Motability Operations has a monopoly on these reliefs,
which cost the Government around £700 million per year. The
Government must explain why providing such state assistance in
the absence of competition is an appropriate use of public money.
- Mobility Operations’ reserves are out of proportion to the
risks it faces, in its privileged market position. Motability
Operations’ reserves increased by 328
per cent from £568 million in 2008 to £2.4 billion in 2017.
Motability Operations has justified such large reserves on the
grounds of its inability to diversify out of its one product –
leasing cars – and one customer base – those in receipt of
mobility welfare payments. However, by its own admission, it
could survive a similar-sized financial crisis to that which
occurred in 2008. Motability could well afford to reduce its
prices, or make higher charitable donations.
- The total remuneration package of
Mike Betts, Chief Executive of Motability Operations, increased
by 78 per cent from £954,000 in 2008 to £1.7 million in 2017. Its
pay is based on a comparison with FTSE 250 companies, but
Mobility Operations does not face the same fundamental risks and
stresses that FTSE 250 companies face. Given its existence as a
taxpayer-supported monopoly, the zero competition it faces for
customers, and the context of restrained welfare spending in
which it operates, the level of Motability Operations’
executives’ pay is totally unacceptable.
- The NAO should conduct a value for money investigation into
the Motability Scheme, with full access to information and
papers. The Committees assert that “given Motability’s
“privileged position, the absence of competitive tendering,
reliance on public funds, and question marks over its approach”
it has a “clear responsibility to accept” such a ‘full access’
review.
Rt Hon. MP, Chair of the Work and
Pensions Committee, said:
“It is impossible to calculate the human happiness that has
resulted from the freedom and independence that Motability scheme
- the first and only scheme of its kind – offers disabled
people.
“But the organisation operates as a monopoly that faces no
competition in accessing disabled people’s often hard-won PIP
benefits.
“The levels of pay pocketed by its executives and the cash
reserves it is hoarding are totally out of whack with reality of
its position in the market. That one member of staff is paid over
ten times what the Prime Minister earns, is one example of where
Motability needs to get a grip of itself and realise the
privileged position in which it trades.
“Its executives must co-operate with a full NAO investigation
into the value it is offering the taxpayers who fund a
significant chunk of its operations.”
Commenting on the Report, Rt Hon. MP, Chair of the Treasury
Committee, said:
“The Motability Scheme is a valuable service that is helping
over 600,000 disabled people live more independently. But such
high levels of executive pay and significant financial reserves
are difficult to square with the honourable objectives of the
scheme.
“It seems that Motability may have lost its way. DWP should
ask the NAO to carry out a full inquiry into the value for money
of the Motability Scheme. This could help ensure that those who
rely on the scheme are able to access it on the best value
terms.”
--Ends--
Notes to Editors
- The Motability Scheme is designed to provide people entitled
to mobility welfare payments with access to a vehicle. The scheme
involves transferring an individual’s mobility welfare payments
to Motability Operations, which provides the individual with a
leased car, along with insurance, maintenance and road-side
assistance. Motability Operations is the company which buys and
leases the vehicles, and Motability is the charity responsible
for oversight of the scheme and making grants in support of its
objectives.